Our Editorial Independence Policy
All members of our expert panel operate under a strict conflict-of-interest policy. Panel members disclose any current or historical commercial relationships with supplement brands to the editorial board annually. Any panel member with a disclosed relationship is excluded from evaluating products made by, or in direct competition with, that brand. No panel member receives performance-based compensation tied to review outcomes.
Dr. Ananya Sharma
MD, Clinical NutritionLeads our clinical evidence review process. 14 years of experience in metabolic medicine and micronutrient deficiency research. Reviews ingredient-dose relationships against peer-reviewed literature.
Rohan Mehta
MSc Sports Science, CSCSSpecialises in performance supplementation — protein, creatine, pre-workout, and recovery formulas. Former national-level athletics coach with 10 years of practical application research.
Dr. Priya Nair
PhD BiochemistryOversees our third-party lab analysis review and Certificate of Analysis verification process. Expert in heavy metal contaminant assessment and ingredient bioavailability research.
Kavita Iyer
BSc Pharmacy, RNutritionistEvaluates women's health, hormonal support, and prenatal supplementation categories. Special focus on dose safety thresholds and interaction screening.
Arjun Patel
MSc Human Nutrition, RDGeneral nutrition specialist covering weight management, gut health, and immune support niches. Author of several peer-reviewed nutrition education publications.
Sneha Kapoor
Health Journalist, MSc Science CommunicationSenior editorial reviewer responsible for consumer-facing content quality, readability, and accuracy. Ensures that technical findings are communicated clearly without losing scientific rigour.
How Our Panel Works
Each product that enters our evaluation pipeline is assigned to a primary reviewer whose expertise aligns with the product's primary category — a sports scientist reviews performance supplements, a clinical nutritionist reviews therapeutic formulas, and so on. A second panel member then conducts an independent review of the same product, and both assessments are reconciled into a final Sarvabhi Review Score.
Disagreements between primary and secondary reviewers are resolved through a structured arbitration process involving the editorial board. Where a genuine scientific controversy exists — for example, where the clinical evidence on a specific ingredient is mixed or limited — this is disclosed in the product's review narrative rather than concealed by a confident-looking score.
Credentials and Ongoing Education
All panel members hold active professional credentials relevant to their role on the platform. We verify credentials at onboarding and on an annual basis. Panel members are also expected to maintain continuing professional development in their field — the clinical and laboratory sciences that underpin supplement evaluation move quickly, and we require our reviewers to move with them.
If you are a qualified nutrition scientist, registered dietitian, sports scientist, or medical writer interested in joining our expert panel, please reach out via our Contact page.